I have a dot pps file with several pictures I haven't seen here. Anyone
interested?

jim

Of course !

"Jim" <jaahrens NOSPAM at yahoo dot com> wrote in message
...
>I have a dot pps file with several pictures I haven't seen here. Anyone
>interested?
>
> jim

O.K. Here goes


"Jim" <jaahrens NOSPAM at yahoo dot com> wrote in message
...
>I have a dot pps file with several pictures I haven't seen here. Anyone
>interested?
>
> jim

"Jim" <jaahrens NOSPAM at yahoo dot com> wrote in message
...
> O.K. Here goes
>
Damn, I guess Airbus needs to add a new test to their program. Can the
airframe survive being dropped over a concrete barrier? I'm sure glad there
were no fatalities.

Rob

I immediately think of a guillotine victim when I see those pictures -
gruesome.

Jack G

"Jim" <jaahrens NOSPAM at yahoo dot com> wrote in message
...
>I have a dot pps file with several pictures I haven't seen here. Anyone
>interested?
>
> jim

Amazing, it looks as though it hit it with some speed, you can see the
scrape marks of the engine cowling as it slid along the wall
A bit of panel beating and a buff up and you'll never know it was in an
accident


"Jim" <jaahrens NOSPAM at yahoo dot com> wrote in message
...
> O.K. Here goes
>
>
> "Jim" <jaahrens NOSPAM at yahoo dot com> wrote in message
> ...
>>I have a dot pps file with several pictures I haven't seen here. Anyone
>>interested?
>>
>> jim
>

It is a blast fence I have no Idea why the jet would be facing the blast
fence on a run up. It does not look like he went straight into the fence
though more of an angle. To be sure next time they do a test you think
they will point the right way?

There were probably more than one blast fence in terh run-up area. He
likley had his engines pointed at one of them and then moved forward
to hit another blast fence..... at a prertty good speed.

HF




On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 23:47:25 GMT, Maple1 > wrote:

>It is a blast fence I have no Idea why the jet would be facing the blast
>fence on a run up. It does not look like he went straight into the fence
>though more of an angle. To be sure next time they do a test you think
>they will point the right way?

"whogoes" > wrote in message
...
> Amazing, it looks as though it hit it with some speed, you can see the
> scrape marks of the engine cowling as it slid along the wall
> A bit of panel beating and a buff up and you'll never know it was in an
> accident

Well the pointy end needs more than a buff. I wouldn't want to be flying
business class (or in the cockpit) of that plane.

"The Raven" > wrote in message
u...
> "whogoes" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Amazing, it looks as though it hit it with some speed, you can see the
>> scrape marks of the engine cowling as it slid along the wall
>> A bit of panel beating and a buff up and you'll never know it was in an
>> accident
>
> Well the pointy end needs more than a buff. I wouldn't want to be flying
> business class (or in the cockpit) of that plane.
>
>

I would imagine that the airframe is a write-off.

Paul Elliot wrote:
>
> I would imagine that the airframe is a write-off.

it might be possible that the wings and the stern section is
salvageable ...

servus

markus

MB> Paul Elliot wrote:

>> I would imagine that the airframe is a write-off.

MB> it might be possible that the wings and the stern section is
MB> salvageable ...

MB> servus

MB> markus

They need to call Red Green. A few rolls of duct tape will put her right!

Cheers,

Indrek Aavisto


--
Criticism is easy; achievement is difficult. W.S. Churchill